Our fourth Audiology Workshop featured Elizabeth Rivera Rosario, AuD, a doctoral student in the Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences at the University at Buffalo. This session explored the clinical aspects of hearing aids, the emergence of over-the-counter (OTC) options, and the technological integration opportunities at this intersection.
Elizabeth began with a comprehensive overview of hearing aid technology and its critical role in managing hearing loss. She emphasized three key benefits of properly fitted hearing aids:
The presentation highlighted the importance of proper fitting and verification in achieving these benefits, particularly through real ear measurements that ensure appropriate amplification is delivered.
Elizabeth outlined the key differences between traditional audiologist-fitted hearing aids and the emerging over-the-counter options:
| Traditional Hearing Aids | Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids |
|---|---|
| Professional assessment and fitting | Self-assessment and self-fitting |
| Real ear measurement verification | No verification or limited self-verification |
| Customized programming | Limited pre-set programming options |
| Higher cost ($1,000-$6,000 per pair) | Lower cost ($200-$1,000 per pair) |
| Bundled follow-up services | Limited or no professional support |
Elizabeth noted that while OTC options have made hearing assistance more accessible, research suggests traditionally fitted devices may provide superior outcomes for many users, particularly those with complex hearing needs.
A significant portion of the session focused on real ear measurement (REM), a critical verification step in the hearing aid fitting process:
Elizabeth explained the process in detail:
Wei Sun clarified that this process measures the true output of the hearing aid when worn by the specific individual, accounting for the unique acoustics of each person's ear canal. The team discussed that this process typically takes 40-60 minutes with a human subject, while coupler measurements (without a human) might take 15-20 minutes but lack personalization.
The discussion addressed how individual ear canal anatomy significantly impacts hearing aid performance:
Varun and Wei Sun highlighted that these anatomical differences explain why generic amplification (as often provided by OTC devices) may not deliver optimal results for many individuals with hearing loss.
The session sparked several discussions about potential technological innovations at the intersection of AI and hearing healthcare:
The team explored using 3D printing technology for hearing aid calibration and verification. Possibilities included:
Discussion centered on how AI might streamline the verification process:
The team considered ways that technology could improve the OTC hearing aid experience:
Elizabeth discussed how the audiology profession is adapting to the OTC hearing aid market:
The group discussed conducting research on audiologists' current perspectives on OTC devices and their impact on clinical practice, with plans to design a survey for local Buffalo audiology clinics.
The workshop identified several promising research directions at the intersection of hearing aid technology, clinical practice, and AI:
The next workshop is scheduled for two weeks later and will feature Anarghya discussing neural representations of hearing.
Doctoral Student, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University at Buffalo
Join us for a presentation on neural representations of hearing.
View Full Schedule